About the authors
Written by Mathilde Chator · Solicitor at Slotine. Mathilde advises on Hong Kong public M&A structuring, Takeovers Code compliance and scheme of arrangement procedures.
Reviewed by Maeva Slotine · Founding Partner. Maeva oversees the firm’s public M&A, privatisation and cross-border listed company practice.
Hong Kong public M&A runs on two parallel regimes. The SFC Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-backs (the “Takeovers Code”) govern the offer process and the conduct of the parties. The Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) sets out the statutory scheme of arrangement procedure that provides an alternative route to acquire a company. On a listed target, the Listing Rules add a third layer of announcement and shareholder approval requirements.
This guide covers the core Takeovers Code obligations that shape any public deal: the Rule 26 mandatory general offer at 30% control, the creeper rule for further acquisitions between 30 and 50%, the chain principle for indirect acquisitions, the Rule 8 announcement regime, and the whitewash waiver. It then compares a general offer to a scheme of arrangement under Cap. 622 section 674, including the 75% voting rights test, the 10% disinterested opposition ceiling for takeover schemes, and how each route reaches full ownership. For related deep-dives see the Slotine Scheme of arrangement complete guide, the M&A in Hong Kong guide, and the Acquisitions practice.
trigger on Takeovers Code targets
test for takeover-related schemes
holding 30% to 50% of voting rights
The Hong Kong Takeovers Code and why it matters
The SFC Codes on Takeovers and Mergers and Share Buy-backs, collectively known as the “Takeovers Code”, set the rules of engagement for public M&A in Hong Kong. Unlike the Companies Ordinance, the Code is not a statute. It is a non-statutory regulatory framework issued by the SFC under section 8 of the Securities and Futures Commission Ordinance. Non-compliance can still lead to public censure, cold shouldering (suspension of market access), or referral to disciplinary proceedings. In practice, Code compliance is treated as a hard requirement by all major participants in the Hong Kong market.
The Code sets out three core protections for minority shareholders: (i) equal treatment (all shareholders of the same class treated equally in an offer), (ii) full information (adequate disclosure so shareholders can make an informed decision), and (iii) equal opportunity (mandatory offer when a controlling stake changes hands).
Scope: when the Code applies
The Code applies to “Code companies”, which fall into two broad categories.
Scope. All companies with shares listed on the Main Board or GEM of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong.
Overlap. Also subject to the HKEX Listing Rules Chapter 14 (Notifiable Transactions) and Chapter 14A (Connected Transactions) for announcement and shareholder approval requirements.
Regulator. Executive of the Takeovers Panel at the SFC administers the Code.
Scope. Hong Kong public companies not listed on HKEX but that meet the SFC test for “public company in Hong Kong”. Includes companies with a significant Hong Kong connection.
Application. The full Takeovers Code applies. Practical challenges include valuation methods and identification of independent shareholders.
Note. Whether a specific unlisted company falls within scope is a fact-specific SFC ruling. Consult the Executive early.
Determining scope is the first step on any transaction involving a Hong Kong company. Where the target is unlisted but has any Hong Kong nexus (registered office, business operations, shareholders), the buyer should confirm the Code position with the Executive early. A late positive determination can force a full mandatory offer that was not budgeted for.
Assessing whether a proposed transaction triggers Rule 26, the creeper rule, or the chain principle? A 30-minute confidential call is enough to identify the Takeovers Code touchpoints before committing.
Rule 26.1 mandatory general offer: the 30% trigger
Rule 26.1 is the central rule of the Code. It requires a mandatory general offer to be made where a person, alone or with concert parties, acquires 30% or more of the voting rights in a Code company. The mandatory offer must be extended to all remaining shareholders on the same terms as the acquisition that triggered it.
30% of voting rights
Acquiring 30% or more of the voting rights in a Code company triggers Rule 26.1: the acquirer must extend a general offer to all remaining shareholders.
2% in any 12-month window
Once holding 30 to 50%, a further acquisition of more than 2% within any 12-month period triggers Rule 26.1. Careful tracking is essential.
Aggregate holdings
Holdings of persons acting in concert are aggregated for the 30% test. The Code presumes certain relationships (family, controlled companies, financial advisers).
Highest price paid in 6 months
The mandatory offer must be at not less than the highest price paid by the offeror and concert parties for the target shares in the 6 months preceding the offer.
The 30% trigger is a hard threshold. Once crossed, the acquirer has no discretion to avoid a general offer. The offer must be launched promptly and follow the strict Code timetable for announcement, offer document, response period, and closing.
The creeper rule and the chain principle
Two extensions of Rule 26 catch acquirers who might otherwise avoid it.
The creeper rule
Once a person (with concert parties) already holds between 30 and 50% of voting rights in a Code company, any further acquisition of more than 2% in any rolling 12-month period triggers Rule 26.1 again. This prevents a controlling shareholder from creeping up to full control without extending an offer to minorities. Every acquisition must be tracked and stamped against the 12-month window.
The chain principle
The chain principle applies where an acquirer buys control of a company (A) that itself holds a stake in a Code company (B). If the effect is that the acquirer gains indirect control of 30% or more of B, the Code may treat the transaction as a Rule 26.1 event in respect of B, forcing a downstream mandatory offer. The Code and Practice Notes set out the tests for when the principle bites, which turn on the relative size and importance of the interest in B.
Rule 8 announcement obligations
Rule 8 governs when and what parties must announce during the offer period. Announcements are typically required at four moments:
- Possible offer. Where a rumour, price movement or market approach creates uncertainty about a potential offer, an announcement of a possible offer may be required to correct market misinformation.
- Firm intention to make an offer (Rule 3.5). Once the offeror is committed and the essential terms are known, a firm intention announcement is made.
- Revised offer terms. Any material change in offer terms triggers an announcement obligation.
- Outcome of the offer. Acceptance levels at each closing date, and the final outcome.
The Rule 8 window can accelerate suddenly. Preparing a template Rule 8 announcement pack in advance of any confidential approach is standard practice.
Choosing between a general offer and a scheme of arrangement is the pivotal structuring decision on any privatisation. Slotine models certainty of completion, timing, and cost trade-offs deal by deal.
The whitewash waiver
Not every acquisition that would trigger Rule 26.1 requires a full general offer. Where the trigger is an allotment of new shares (a placement or subscription), the incoming shareholder can seek a whitewash waiver from the Executive of the Takeovers Panel.
Issuance of new shares triggering Rule 26
Where an allotment of new shares would push a subscriber (alone or with concert parties) over the 30% threshold or beyond the 2% creeper ceiling, Rule 26.1 would otherwise apply.
Waiver by disinterested shareholders
The Code allows a whitewash waiver of the mandatory offer obligation if the transaction is approved by a majority of independent shareholders (excluding the incoming holder and its concert parties) at a general meeting.
Application to the Executive
The whitewash application is filed with the Executive of the Takeovers Panel with a scheme document, independent financial adviser (IFA) opinion, and independent board committee recommendation.
Whitewash waivers are common on strategic investments, PE minorities, and restructurings where new capital is raised. They require a carefully coordinated regulatory package: the Executive application, an IFA opinion, an independent board committee recommendation, and a shareholder circular. The process runs alongside the HKEX Listing Rules Chapter 14A connected transaction procedure where applicable.
Takeover offer vs scheme of arrangement
Two routes reach full ownership of a Hong Kong target: a contractual takeover offer under the Code, or a statutory scheme of arrangement under Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) sections 670 to 674. The choice is the most important structuring decision on any privatisation.
Nature. Contractual offer by the acquirer to each shareholder. Governed by the Takeovers Code.
Full ownership. Squeeze-out under Cap. 622 sections 693 and 706 available if the offeror receives acceptances for 90% or more of the shares to which the offer relates.
Timeline. Faster to launch, no court process, but relies on acceptance rates.
Certainty. Uncertain until the 90% acceptance threshold is met.
Nature. Statutory procedure under Cap. 622 sections 670 to 674. Court-sanctioned compromise binding on all shareholders.
Approval test. For takeover-related schemes, section 674(2)(a): 75% of voting rights present and voting AND votes against not exceeding 10% of the total voting rights attached to all disinterested shares.
Timeline. Longer due to court hearings but binds 100% of shareholders on sanction.
Certainty. Higher once the shareholder meeting passes: full ownership on court sanction.
The section 674(2) voting test in detail
For schemes involving a takeover offer, Cap. 622 section 674(2)(a) sets a two-limb test that departs from the general 75% + majority-in-number rule for other schemes:
- Members representing at least 75% of the voting rights of the members present and voting, in person or by proxy, agree to the arrangement; and
- The votes cast against the arrangement do not exceed 10% of the total voting rights attached to all disinterested shares in the company.
Section 674(3) defines “disinterested shares” to exclude those held by the offeror, its associates, and acquisition agreement parties. The 10% headcount test that applies to non-takeover schemes is disapplied for takeover-related schemes, which was a legislative fix to remove the abuse potential of the older headcount test.
Squeeze-out at 90% for takeover offers
A takeover offeror reaches 100% ownership of the target only if it receives acceptances for 90% or more of the shares to which the offer relates. Cap. 622 sections 693 and 706 provide the compulsory acquisition mechanism at that threshold. Below 90%, the buyer is left holding a public company with a residual minority, which has to be managed alongside ongoing Code and Listing Rule obligations.
HKEX Listing Rules Chapter 14 in parallel
On a HKEX-listed target, the Code sits alongside the Listing Rules Chapter 14 (Notifiable Transactions) and Chapter 14A (Connected Transactions). Depending on the size percentage ratios (assets, consideration, revenue, profits, and equity capital), a transaction may be classified as a share transaction, discloseable transaction, major transaction, very substantial disposal, very substantial acquisition, or reverse takeover. Each classification triggers escalating announcement, circular, and independent shareholder approval requirements.
Chapter 14A adds connected party rules where the counterparty is a director, substantial shareholder, or their associate. Practical planning of a public M&A transaction integrates the Code and Chapter 14 workstreams from the first term sheet.
Five common Takeovers Code mistakes
Failure to identify a concert relationship (family holdings, joint venture partner, financial adviser) leads to under-reporting of aggregate holdings and inadvertent Rule 26 breach.
Holders at 30 to 50% must count every acquisition against the 2% rolling 12-month ceiling. Open-market buying by concert parties can push aggregate holdings past 2% and trigger a full mandatory offer.
Rumour and price movement can force an announcement obligation earlier than planned. Prepare a Rule 8 announcement pack in advance of any confidential approach or press leak scenario.
Selecting a contractual takeover offer over a scheme without stress-testing likely acceptance rates can leave the buyer stuck below 90% and unable to squeeze out minorities.
A public M&A transaction on a HKEX-listed target commonly triggers Chapter 14 (Notifiable Transactions) and Chapter 14A (Connected Transactions) announcement and shareholder approval requirements, on top of the Code.
Slotine advises on Takeovers Code compliance, whitewash waivers, mandatory general offers, and scheme of arrangement drafting and court sanctioning. Free scoping call, fee proposal within a few working days.
How Slotine advises on Hong Kong public M&A
Slotine advises acquirers, targets, IFAs, PE sponsors, and financial advisers across the Hong Kong public M&A workflow:
- Structuring: assess concert party positions, model Rule 26 triggers, choose between contractual offer and scheme, integrate Chapter 14 Listing Rules workflows.
- Rule 8 announcements: draft possible offer, firm intention, and revised offer announcements. Advise on triggering events.
- Mandatory offer execution: offer document, response letter, acceptance mechanics, and the Code timetable.
- Whitewash waiver: Executive application, IFA opinion coordination, independent board committee governance, and shareholder circular.
- Scheme of arrangement: Cap. 622 section 670 court order for meeting, section 673 court sanction, section 674(2) voting test structuring, and Registrar filings. See the Scheme of arrangement complete guide.
- Cross-border: coordinate with international counsel via Legalmondo and Ursusnetwork where the offeror or target is domiciled outside Hong Kong.


